I'm still trying to dig my way through all the contradictory explanations about
who is offended and
why. According to 23-year old Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, who is designated "spokesperson for the organisations in 'the case'", it wasn't the drawings as such, but rather the
context. (
Danish text, my translation): "
We probably wouldn't have been so offended if the drawings had been published in another context, explains Asmaa Abdol-Hamid, who expects the court to agree with her".
Time and time again the media have told us that Islam forbids to portray Muhammed - end-of-discussion. But according to Abdol-Hamid the drawings are not offending in themselves - it's the context.
Sometimes a Dane can dream with Wulff and Morgenthaler:
